Skip to main content
· 2/7/2012

Gregory Heinen v. Northrop Grumman

Citations

  • 671 F.3d 669
  • 2012 WL 372988
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \this court is not inclined to award sanctions in favor of a party that cannot be bothered to follow the rules itself\
  • “[R]esidence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile—that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run.”
  • “[R]esidence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile–that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run.”
  • “[R]esidence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile–that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run.”
  • citizenship “depends on domicile— that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run. An allegation of ‘residence’ is therefore deficient”
  • adding alle- gations of domicile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Rovner, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.