· 6/22/1990
James Baylis, Cross-Appellees v. Marriott Corporation, Cross-Appellant
Citations
- 906 F.2d 874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding Railway Labor Act preempted airline employees’ claims against third party for tortious inducement of breach of their CBA because resolution required interpretation of CBA
- holding RLA preempted state-law claims from airline employees that hotel tortiously induced the airline to breach its contract with employees
- “Since plaintiffs cannot establish that Marriott tortiously induced Pan Am to breach without establishing the meaning of the collective bargaining agreement and its breach by Pan Am, their claims of tortious inducement of breach are preempted by the RLA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaufman, Kearse, Miner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.