Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 11/27/1996

Chill v. General Electric Co.

Citations

  • 101 F.3d 263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the accuracy of plaintiffs’ alleged misrepresentations by defendant was irrelevant, and dismissal was appropriate, because plaintiffs failed to allege the requisite scienter
  • generalized motive to justify investment and have it appear profitable, “one which could be imputed to any publicly-owned, for-profit endeavor, is not sufficiently concrete for purposes of inferring scienter”
  • “Fraud cannot be inferred simply because GE might have been more curious or concerned about the activity at Kidder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Miner, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.