Gabriel Capital, L.P. v. NatWest Finance, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the allegation that, if the defendant were found liable, it would be “entitled to indemnification and/or contribution” failed to state a plausible claim
• holding that a complaint “fail[ed] to plead a claim against the Doe defendants” under Rule 8(a) where it contained no information specific to the identities or actions of those defendants
• dismissing crossclaim that defendant was entitled to in- demnification and/or contribution from co-defendants without a cause of action or supporting facts
• dismissing third-party claim for contribution \against a plaintiff's agent where that claim [was] identical to defendant's affirmative defense\
• “I assume … that the theory of liability 72 Doc. #18 at 58 (¶¶ 225–26
• “It is well established that plaintiffs cannot plead scienter based on speculation and conclusory allegations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).