Skip to main content
· 10/26/2004

Ware v. Billington

Citations

  • 344 F. Supp. 2d 63
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21617
  • 2004 WL 2406624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the mere initiation of [an] investigation does not” constitute an adverse employment action
  • explaining that Title VII plaintiffs failure to submit proper medical documentation was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory explanation for designating plaintiff AWOL
  • stating that “although the discipline imposed as a result of an investigation may have a sufficiently adverse effect on plaintiffs employment to be actionable, the mere initiation of the investigation does not”
  • “[Although the discipline imposed as a result of an investigation may have a sufficiently adverse effect on plaintiff[’]s employment to be actionable, the mere initiation of the investigation does not.”
  • “[T]he request for an investigation by an independent body (as opposed to the disciplinary action that may follow) does not constitute an actionable adverse employment action.”
  • “[A]lthough the discipline imposed as a result of an investigation may have a sufficiently adverse effect on plaintiff’s employment to be actionable, the mere initiation of the investigation does not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.