· 10/26/2004
Ware v. Billington
Citations
- 344 F. Supp. 2d 63
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21617
- 2004 WL 2406624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the mere initiation of [an] investigation does not” constitute an adverse employment action
- explaining that Title VII plaintiffs failure to submit proper medical documentation was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory explanation for designating plaintiff AWOL
- stating that “although the discipline imposed as a result of an investigation may have a sufficiently adverse effect on plaintiffs employment to be actionable, the mere initiation of the investigation does not”
- “[Although the discipline imposed as a result of an investigation may have a sufficiently adverse effect on plaintiff[’]s employment to be actionable, the mere initiation of the investigation does not.”
- “[T]he request for an investigation by an independent body (as opposed to the disciplinary action that may follow) does not constitute an actionable adverse employment action.”
- “[A]lthough the discipline imposed as a result of an investigation may have a sufficiently adverse effect on plaintiff’s employment to be actionable, the mere initiation of the investigation does not.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.