Skip to main content
· 8/15/2008

Chhay v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 540 F.3d 1
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 17427
  • 2008 WL 3573100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that petitioner had not sustained burden of proof when her testimony anent political party membership was unconvincing and uncorroborated
  • indicating that successful CAT claim must have nexus linking government official to torture inflicted or to be inflicted upon petitioner
  • finding no loss causation when 2 the stock rebounded within three trading days
  • upholding likelihood of confusion where defendant “admitted that he intentionally used [plaintiff’s] marks on [defendant’s] website for the express purpose of attracting customers to [defendant’s] website and that he chose [plaintiff’s mark] because of its strong reputation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Selya, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.