Mariko v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding agency’s conclusion 5 that applicant’s beating by family planning officials did not 6 rise to level of persecution where it occurred prior to 7 detention and applicant required no formal medical 8 attention
• “Conditions [like inpatient treatment] that 13 touch on significant liberty interests are qualitatively different from those that 14 do not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).