First Circuit· 2/14/2008
Teng v. Mukasey
Citations
- 516 F.3d 12
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3164
- 2008 WL 384232
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[F]ew proceedings are perfect and one can have real errors, including ones that adversely affect a party’s interests, without automatically violating the Constitution.”
- “As an initial matter, software alone cannot extract data 16 from a physical device; it can only control hardware that extracts data.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wang v. HolderFifth Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 631×
- Pulisir v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 69×
- Chhay v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-08-15· cited 66×
- MUN~ OZ-MONSALVE v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-12-12· cited 51×
- Walker v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-12-11· cited 44×
- Oroh v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-03-27· cited 20×
- Ruiz-Escobar v. SessionsFirst Circuit· 2018-02-02· cited 16×
- Santosa v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-06-11· cited 15×
- Abdelmalek v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-08-25· cited 15×
- CHUN XIN CHI v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2010-05-26· cited 14×
- Sitha Ly v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-04-24· cited 13×
- Ying Jin Lin v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-03-30· cited 12×
- ZHOU ZHENG v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-06-30· cited 11×
- Ramirez Matias v. SessionsFirst Circuit· 2017-09-08· cited 7×
- Mboowa v. LynchFirst Circuit· 2015-07-21· cited 6×
- Rothbaum v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2014-09-29· cited 5×
- Santana v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2009-05-19· cited 4×
- Brady v. School Board, Somersworth, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2016-11-03· cited 2×
- Semenov v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2009-09-28
- Miller v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2010-10-15
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- Audelio Arriaga-Barrientos v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1991-07-01· cited 263×
- Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceFirst Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 242×
- Laeila Nelson, Stephanie Nelson, Phil Nelson v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFirst Circuit· 2000-10-27· cited 176×
- Valli Kandiah Ravindran v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceFirst Circuit· 1992-09-30· cited 163×
- Lopez De Hincapie v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2007-07-17· cited 128×
- United States v. SmithFirst Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 65×
- Harutyunyan v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2005-09-02· cited 63×
- Jose Ortiz-Salas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSeventh Circuit· 1993-04-22· cited 63×
- Kheireddine v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2005-10-25· cited 53×
- Mekhoukh v. AshcroftFirst Circuit· 2004-02-13· cited 52×
- Alibeaj v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2006-11-22· cited 37×
- Jorgji v. MukaseyFirst Circuit· 2008-01-24· cited 36×
- Heng v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2007-07-12· cited 27×
- TOMASBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1987-07-01· cited 17×
- Tum v. GonzalesFirst Circuit· 2007-10-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.