Eke v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he Real ID Act changed the landscape for our review of this type of claim,” namely claims that the IJ erred in requiring corroborating evi- dence
• the court was “satisfied that Eke has been trying to raise the argument that his convictions, for various reasons, should not automatically lead to his removal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).