Building Industry Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that New York City engaged in proprietary conduct in signing a PLA
• holding that New York City engaged in proprietary conduct in signing a PLA
• stating that “[f]ederal preemption doctrine evaluates what legislation does, not why legislators voted for it or what political coalition led to its enactment”
• declining to “search for an impermissible motive where a permissible purpose is apparent”
• summarily “reject[ing] [an] argument . . . [that was] raised only in a single paragraph of the brief and without citation to authority”
• summarily “reject[ing] [an] argument . . . [that was] raised only in a single paragraph of the brief and without citation to authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).