Skip to main content
· 1/21/1993

Ralph S. Weaver, Etc. v. Charles Henderson, Etc.

Citations

  • 984 F.2d 11
  • 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 431
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 902
  • 1993 WL 9073

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that whether the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits is the “sine qua non” of the test for a preliminary injunction
  • “[W]hether the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits” is the “sine qua non” of the test for a preliminary injunction.”
  • \The sine qua non of [the injunctive relief analysis] is whether the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits.\
  • “In the ordinary course, plaintiffs who are unable to convince the trial court that they will probably succeed on the merits will not obtain interim injunctive relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Coffin, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.