White and White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing “the confusion arising from the comparatively recent use of ‘submarket analysis’ by courts”
• “[T]he preponderance of authority holds that the determination of-a relevant market is composed of the articulation of a legal test which is then applied to the factual circumstances of each case;”
• “The fundamental error of the district judge . . . was the mistaken premise that standard market tests may be abandoned or ignored and replaced with a less demanding ‘submarket test.’”
• “The area of effective competition in the known line of commerce must be charted by careful selection of the market area in which the seller operates, and to which the purchaser can practicably turn for supplies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).