Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v. Baccarat, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellate court is “not bound by the trial court's rationale, but may affirm [the trial court's] judgment for any valid reason that finds support in the record”
• explaining that alleged retaliation for engaging in protected 13 activity can support a hostile work environment claim
• stating that “[b]ecause injuries to goodwill and reputation are not easily quantifiable, courts often find this type of harm irreparable”
• stating that “[i]njunctions must be tailored to the specific harm to be prevented”
• stating that irreparable harm is an “essential prerequisite” for receiving injunctive relief
• “Because injuries to goodwill and reputation are not easily quantifiable, courts often find this type of harm irreparable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).