Skip to main content

Tepanca v. State

Citations

  • 297 Ga. 47
  • 771 S.E.2d 879
  • 2015 Ga. LEXIS 238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not err in failing to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter, because as a matter of law the defendant’s “sexual jealousy was based wholly on supposition”
  • reasoning that the trial court did not err in failing to instruct the jury on sexual jealousy, because the defendant’s “sexual jealousy was based wholly on supposition”
  • “[Appellant] leaves this Court to engage in a guessing game as to how appellate counsel’s representation, or rather lack thereof, might have amounted to ineffective assistance. Under these circumstances, [Appellant] has failed to show even a possibility of ineffective assistance[.]”
  • be- cause defendant’s “sexual jealousy was based wholly on supposi- tion” that his affair partner “had gone out with” the victim, the evidence did not authorize a jury instruction on sexual jealousy as provocation for voluntary manslaughter
  • no error in denying request for instruction on mutual combat where the defendant claimed that he did not want to fight the victim but shot the victim in self-defense after he thought he saw the victim reaching for something

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Tepanca v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.