Changxu Jiang v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an “attorney’s decision, even if unwise in hindsight, was a tactical decision that [would] not constitute ineffective assistance”
• concluding that an “attorney’s decision, even if unwise in hindsight, was a tactical decision that [would] not constitute ineffective assistance”
• finding no ineffective assistance where counsel made the “strategic decision” to withdraw the alien’s application for withholding of removal and seek only voluntary departure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Debeatham v. Holder
  Second Circuit· 2010-04-28· cited 60×
• Zanyu Jin v. Holder
  Second Circuit· 2009-09-18· cited 1×
• Singh v. Mukasey
  Second Circuit· 2008-04-11
• Xiuquing Jiang v. Mukasey
  Second Circuit· 2008-07-15
• Munro v. Mukasey
  Second Circuit· 2008-09-24

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Yan Chen v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, 1
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 2,703×
• LOZADA
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1988-07-01· cited 1,900×
• Jian Hua Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals
  Second Circuit· 2007-11-29· cited 186×
• Jian Yun Zheng v. United States Department of Justice, John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General
  Second Circuit· 2005-05-20· cited 174×
• Sofyan Ali Saleh v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Second Circuit· 1992-04-29· cited 171×
• Antonio Esposito v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Second Circuit· 1993-03-01· cited 162×
• Thomas Leblanc and Marie Margaret Leblanc v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  First Circuit· 1983-08-18· cited 55×
• Francisco Romero v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, John Ashcroft and James M. Ziglar
  Second Circuit· 2005-02-09· cited 20×