Antonio Esposito v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that, to allege prejudice, petitioner must show that “result would have been different” had counsel not erred
• concluding that all evidentiary requirements had been met
• vacating the BIA’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to reopen and reconsider deportation order on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel where the petitioner complied with Lozada’s requirements
• excusing bar complaint requirement where petitioner mistakenly believed that attorney' had already been suspended from the practice of law
• addressing ineffective assistance of counsel where counsel failed to file an appeal
• “Esposito has not escaped from custody, the INS never requested a bench warrant for his arrest, and Esposito never concealed his whereabouts from the INS.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).