Jian Yun Zheng v. United States Department of Justice, John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim the petitioner must “comply substantially” with the procedural requirements of In re Lozada
• holding that “alien who has failed to comply substantially with the Lozada requirements . . . before the BIA forfeits h[is] ineffective assistance of counsel claim in this Court”
• holding that an alien who has failed to comply substantially with the Lozada requirements in her motion to reopen before the BIA forfeits her ineffective assistance of counsel claim
• holding that because petitioner “made no effort to demonstrate that the affidavits and additional documentary evidence she submitted in support of her motion to reopen met [the] requirements [under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1)], the BIA was not obligated to consider them”
• providing that failure to comply with Lozada will 4 result in forfeiture of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
• explaining that assertions of ineffective assistance of counsel must comply with the Lozada requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).