Second Circuit· 9/29/1994

Hathaway v. Coughlin

Citations

37 F.3d 63
1994 WL 528607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, inter alia, two-year delay in surgery despite plaintiffs repeated complaints of pain could support finding of deliberate indifference
holding that a two year delay in arranging necessary surgery could support a finding of deliberate indifference
holding that “the fact that [defendant] frequently examined [plaintiff does not] necessarily vindicate [defendant]” where “[t]he course of treatment [plaintiff] received clearly did not alleviate his suffering”
noting that standard contemplates “a condition of urgency, one that may produce death, degeneration, or extreme pain”
noting that standard contemplates “a condition of urgency, one that may produce death, degeneration, or extreme pain”
noting that standard contemplates “a condition of urgency, one that may produce death, degeneration, or extreme pain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altimari, Jacobs, McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

219 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hathaway v. Coughlin

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.