Newman & Schwartz v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that unjust enrichment claim was properly pleaded in alternative to breach of contract claim where one defendant disputed being a party to the contract
• noting that the Court may only consider allegations in the Complaint and documents incorporated therein in evaluating a motion to dismiss
• noting that in considering a motion to dismiss, a “district court must limit itself to facts stated in the complaint”
• finding that a claim for unjust enrichment was “properly pleaded as such in the alternative to the [breach of contract claim]”
• holding the district court improperly relied upon information outside of the four corners of [plaintiff's] complaint
• finding that law firm’s complaint alleging breach of contract stated a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).