Skip to main content

C.G. v. J.H.

Citations

  • 172 A.3d 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that while standing claims commonly necessitate an evidentiary hearing to resolve the factual dispute, some standing issues can turn on pure questions of law
  • explaining that when standing issues turn on questions of fact, the court should hear evidence
  • noting our deference to a trial court’s factual findings where those findings are required to resolve preliminary objections
  • asserting the Commonwealth did not “establish[] that it is a controlled substance[,] and that’s one of the requirements for” a conviction of PWID
  • “Because standing goes to a party’s capacity to sue, a standing objection is properly raised by an objection under Rule 1028(a)(5).”
  • “A demurrer tests only whether, as a matter of law, the pleaded allegations may entitle the pleader to relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moulton, Musmanno, Solano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.