Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/28/2000

Butler v. Illes

Citations

747 A.2d 943
2000 Pa. Super. 54
2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 157
2000 WL 222026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding appellant waived claim where she failed to set forth adequate argument concerning her claim on appeal; 4 We observe that Rule 1925(c)(2
holding appellant waived claim where appellant failed to set forth adequate argument concerning claim on appeal
holding “[w]hen issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs, when briefs are wholly inadequate to present specific issues for review, a court will not consider the merits thereof”
stating that when an issue is not properly raised and developed in the brief, and when the brief is wholly inadequate to present a specific issue for review, this Court will not consider the merits thereof
holding appellant’s failure to cogently explain why trial court abused its discretion or committed error of law constitutes waiver of claim on appeal; this Court cannot act as counsel for appellant and craft argument on her behalf
holding appellant’s failure to cogently explain why trial court abused its discretion or committed error of law constitutes waiver of claim on appeal; this Court cannot act as counsel for appellant and craft argument on her behalf

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Eakin, Olszewski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.