Butler v. Illes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appellant waived claim where she failed to set forth adequate argument concerning her claim on appeal; 4 We observe that Rule 1925(c)(2
• holding appellant waived claim where appellant failed to set forth adequate argument concerning claim on appeal
• holding “[w]hen issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs, when briefs are wholly inadequate to present specific issues for review, a court will not consider the merits thereof”
• stating that when an issue is not properly raised and developed in the brief, and when the brief is wholly inadequate to present a specific issue for review, this Court will not consider the merits thereof
• holding appellant’s failure to cogently explain why trial court abused its discretion or committed error of law constitutes waiver of claim on appeal; this Court cannot act as counsel for appellant and craft argument on her behalf
• holding appellant’s failure to cogently explain why trial court abused its discretion or committed error of law constitutes waiver of claim on appeal; this Court cannot act as counsel for appellant and craft argument on her behalf

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).