Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 1/29/2019

Cervantes v. Ardagh Grp.

Citations

  • 914 F.3d 560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no claim for retaliation is possible when employer did not know of protected activity
  • complaint was not reasonably related to EEOC charge describing different allegations, time period, and individuals
  • “The administrative retaliation charge therefore never gave Ardagh reasonable notice of Mr. Cervantes’s discrimination claims, nor did it provide Ardagh and the agency an opportunity to resolve his concerns before they ripened into this suit.”
  • retaliation claim fails without evidence that supervisors were aware of complaint
  • affirming dismissal of an IHRA claim on exhaustion grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrett, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.