Kimberly Conner v. Illinois Department of Natural Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a December 2002 non-promotion was outside the scope of the plaintiff’s EEOC charges because the charges were dated November 1, 2002
• noting that to bring a Title VII claim, a plaintiff must first “file a charge with the EEOC detailing the alleged discriminatory conduct”
• noting that to bring a Title VII claim, a plaintiff must first “file a charge with the EEOC detailing the alleged discriminatory conduct”
• concluding it was impossible for the EEOC to undertake a preliminary investigation of non-promotion that occurred a month after the EEOC charge was filed
• concluding it was impossible for the EEOC to undertake a preliminary investigation of non-promotion that occurred a month after the EEOC charge was filed
• noting that “claims brought in judicial proceedings must be within the scope of the charge filed with the EEOC” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).