Skip to main content
Texas Supreme Court· 12/31/2002

Centex Homes v. Buecher

Citations

  • 95 S.W.3d 266
  • 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 294
  • 2002 Tex. LEXIS 219
  • 2001 WL 34055991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the implied warranty of habitability “does not include defects, even substantial ones, that are known by or expressly disclosed to the buyer”
  • stating that habitability contemplates a “house that is safe, sanitary, and otherwise fit for human habitation”
  • providing that courts will only imply a warranty of good workmanship as a “gap-filler” or “default warranty” if the parties have not expressed a contrary intention (citation omitted)
  • explaining the differences between the implied warranty of habitability and the implied warranty of workmanlike construction
  • noting courts may supplement implied terms based on Restatement section 204, which as discussed above, is distinguished from consulting trade usage
  • implied warranty of habitability “can be waived only to the extent that defects are adequately disclosed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Hankinson, O'Neill, Jefferson, Smith, Hecht, Owen, Enoch, Schneider

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.