Skip to main content
· 5/18/1979

Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.

Citations

  • 389 N.E.2d 1154
  • 76 Ill. 2d 31
  • 27 Ill. Dec. 746
  • 1979 Ill. LEXIS 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, if agreement had contained express covenants concerning the quality of construction, they would not have merged in the deed, but would have continued as a collateral undertaking
  • defining latent defect as one that is not readily discoverable through reasonable and diligent inspection
  • defining latent defect as one that is not readily discoverable through reasonable and diligent inspection
  • defining latent defect as one that is not readily discoverable through reasonable and diligent inspection
  • defining latent defect as one that is not readily discoverable through reasonable and diligent inspection
  • defining latent defect as one that is not readily discoverable through reasonable and diligent inspection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.