District of Columbia· 12/14/2004
Catalyst & Chemical Services, Inc. v. Global Ground Support
Citations
- 350 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25069
- 2004 WL 2861407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the plaintiff “lacks standing to maintain this action” because its “corporate charter was forfeited” prior to the suit’s initiation
- denying motion for summary judgment on unfair competition claim and declining to decide matter when plaintiffs “provide no support for this motion in either their memorandum in support or reply” (citing LCvR 7(a)
- applying District of Columbia version of UTSA in concluding that where each parameter was publicly known, “the value of the specific combination of parameters must exceed the mere sum of the value of each individual parameter”
- first passage quoting State ex rel. the Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dep’t of Ins., 687 N.E. 2d 661, 675 (1997); second passage quoting Mangren Rsch. & Dev. Corp. v. Nat’l Chem. Co., 87 F.3d 937, 942 (7th Cir. 1996)
- explaining damages are required for a DCUTSA claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mike's Train House, Inc. v. Lionel, L.L.C., Korea Brass and Yoo Chan YangSixth Circuit· 2006-12-14· cited 167×
- Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC v. Bank of America Corp.Second Circuit· 2021-03-17· cited 89×
- DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.District of Columbia· 2007-03-27· cited 51×
- Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Genesis Equipment & Manufacturing, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 2009-08-12· cited 29×
- Millennium Square Residential Association v. 2200 M Street LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2013-07-10· cited 25×
- Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc. v. GaubatzDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-06· cited 20×
- Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. CafesjianDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-09· cited 15×
- Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. v. FurstenauE.D. Michigan· 2019-02-20· cited 12×
- Port-A-Pour, Inc. v. Peak Innovations, Inc.D. Colorado· 2014-06-17· cited 2×
- DesRoches v. USPSD. New Hampshire· 2006-06-12· cited 2×
- Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. CafesjianDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-22
- Mike's Train House v. Lionel LLCSixth Circuit· 2006-12-14
- Thorp v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2018-05-24
- Meyer Group, Ltd v. RaybornDistrict of Columbia· 2020-09-28
- Hirecounsel Dc, LLC v. ConnollyDistrict of Columbia· 2021-12-20
- Aristotle International, Inc. v. Acuant, Inc.District of Columbia· 2023-02-02
- FMC Technologies, Inc. v. Richard Murphy and Dril-Quip, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2023-08-10
- Hirecounsel Dc, LLC v. ConnollyDistrict of Columbia· 2024-07-31
- Trilogy Federal, LLC v. Civitasdx LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2025-02-09
- Kight v. Crunchy Tobacco, Inc.District of Columbia· 2025-03-25
Cites
89 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 3,226×
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 2,968×
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 1,423×
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesD.C. Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 1,322×
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyD.C. Circuit· 1987-03-17· cited 1,192×
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-01-17· cited 978×
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict of Columbia· 2001-08-14· cited 854×
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Federal Circuit· 1985-10-16· cited 787×
- Edward Haase v. William S. Sessions, Director, F.B.I.D.C. Circuit· 1987-12-15· cited 742×
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationFederal Circuit· 1998-11-18· cited 719×
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossFederal Circuit· 2004-02-11· cited 685×
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentD.C. Circuit· 1983-08-12· cited 680×
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Federal Circuit· 2002-08-30· cited 652×
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyFederal Circuit· 1995-06-21· cited 625×
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationFederal Circuit· 1998-09-09· cited 607×
Other cases named Catalyst & Chemical Services, Inc. v. Global Ground Support
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.