Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 329 S.W.3d 74
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 8913
  • 2010 WL 4467632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “when determining if the trial court should have had a bona fide doubt as to competency, we do not typically consider evidence brought to the trial court’s attention for the first time after sentencing”
  • “Texas’ competency statutes allow competency to be raised . . . at any time before sentence is pronounced.”
  • court would not consider evidence brought to the trial court’s attention for first time in motion for new trial in evaluating argument that trial court abused its discretion in failing to conduct sua sponte competency inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leslie B. Yates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.