Carter v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When confronting such a request from a prisoner, courts have consistently held that a prisoner acting pro se ‘is inadequate to represent the interests of his fellow inmates in a class action.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Wilson v. Lohman
  D. Delaware· 2008-09-19

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Erickson v. Pardus
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Farmer v. Brennan
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
• Estelle v. Gamble
  Supreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 28,035×
• Phillips v. County of Allegheny
  Third Circuit· 2008-02-05· cited 8,116×
• Christopher v. Harbury
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 2,579×
• Natale v. Camden County Correctional Facility
  Third Circuit· 2003-02-07· cited 1,838×
• Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
  Supreme Court· 2002-01-08· cited 1,389×
• Bragdon v. Abbott
  Supreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 1,379×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1999-06-29· cited 1,308×
• Sample v. Diecks
  Third Circuit· 1989-09-12· cited 770×
• Miller v. Correctional Medical Systems, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1992-08-28· cited 57×
• Caputo v. Fauver
  D. New Jersey· 1992-09-30· cited 39×
• Maldonado v. Terhune
  D. New Jersey· 1998-12-04· cited 31×
• Jordan v. Delaware Ex Rel. Delaware Department of Corrections
  D. Delaware· 2006-06-09· cited 11×