D. New Jersey· 9/30/1992
Caputo v. Fauver
Citations
- 800 F. Supp. 168
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15133
- 1992 WL 249373
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Every court that has considered the issue has held that a prisoner proceeding pro se is inadequate to represent the interests of his fellow inmates in a class action.”
- “Every court that has considered the issue has held that a prisoner proceeding pro se is inadequate to represent the interests of his fellow inmates in a class action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brotman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Prisoners' Legal Ass'n v. RobersonD. New Jersey· 1993-05-26· cited 38×
- Maldonado v. TerhuneD. New Jersey· 1998-12-04· cited 31×
- Mobley v. ColemanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-03-27· cited 28×
- Craig v. CohnN.D. Indiana· 2000-01-07· cited 18×
- Jordan v. Delaware Ex Rel. Delaware Department of CorrectionsD. Delaware· 2006-06-09· cited 11×
- L.A. ex rel. Z.Kh. v. HoffmanD. New Jersey· 2015-10-28· cited 10×
- Mayer v. GottheinerD. New Jersey· 2005-08-10· cited 9×
- Vazquez v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict of Columbia· 2013-11-21· cited 8×
- Carter v. TaylorD. Delaware· 2008-03-29· cited 6×
- Johnson-Bey v. Indiana Department of CorrectionsN.D. Indiana· 2009-10-20· cited 5×
- Duffy v. MassinariE.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-06-15· cited 3×
- Allnew v. City of DuluthD. Minnesota· 1997-06-02· cited 2×
- Caputo (Vincent J.) v. Fauver (William H.), Crawford (Warren D.), Edmiston (Robert D.), Troyanovich (Stephen), Finlay (Daniel), Gruccio (Patricia)Third Circuit· 1993-05-18· cited 1×
- Wilson v. LohmanD. Delaware· 2008-09-19
- Rivera v. Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-28
- Miles v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-30
- Salter v. SamuelsDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-24
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 3,211×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Oxendine v. WilliamsFourth Circuit· 1975-02-12· cited 452×
- Martin Allen Johnson v. Robert Moore, Superintendent, Clallam Bay Corrections CenterNinth Circuit· 1991-10-09· cited 392×
- James Wright v. Lanson Newsome, WardenEleventh Circuit· 1986-08-06· cited 280×
- Kershner v. MazurkiewiczThird Circuit· 1982-02-01· cited 237×
- Willie Williams, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Michael P. Lane, Director of the Illinois Department of CorrectionsSeventh Circuit· 1988-08-29· cited 180×
- Johnny B. McGOWAN, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAULKNER CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1981-10-15· cited 132×
- Peterkin v. JeffesThird Circuit· 1988-08-23· cited 131×
- Zenith Laboratories, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carter-Wallace, IncThird Circuit· 1976-02-10· cited 96×
- Rhodes v. RobinsonThird Circuit· 1979-12-28· cited 85×
- Fred A. Cruz, Enrique B. Andrade and Isaias Lara v. W. B. (Bill) HauckFifth Circuit· 1980-10-08· cited 74×
- Hudson v. RobinsonThird Circuit· 1982-05-18· cited 60×
- National Expositions, Inc. v. Crowley Maritime CorporationFirst Circuit· 1987-07-24· cited 57×
- Desvi, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Continental Insurance CompanyThird Circuit· 1992-06-12· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.