Skip to main content
· 6/29/1999

Federal Case

Citations

  • 182 F.3d 192
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that providing- diabetic inmates with only one insulin injection per day and less-than-daily blood sugar monitoring, when they needed more, can constitute deliberate indifference
  • stating that a plaintiff must demonstrate “acts or omissions by prison officials that indicate deliberate indifference”
  • reasoning that deliberate indifference may be found where a prison official “persists in a particular course of treatment in the face of resultant pain and risk of permanent injury” (internal quotations omitted)
  • noting that claims of medical malpractice or negligence do not constitute deliberate indifference
  • noting that the Third Circuit has found deliberate indifference in such circumstances
  • noting “it is possible that conduct that violates the Eighth Amendment rights of the unstable [diabetic] plaintiffs may not violate the constitutional rights of the stable [diabetic] plaintiffs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.