Skip to main content

McKenna v. State

Citations

  • 968 P.2d 739
  • 114 Nev. 1044
  • 1998 Nev. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that admissible penalty evidence must satisfy NRS 48.035(1)
  • recognizing that admissible penalty evidence must satisfy NRS 48.035(1)
  • noting that the “[fjailure to object to or request a jury instruction precludes appellate review, unless the error is patently prejudicial and requires the court to act sua sponte to protect the defendant’s right to a fair trial”
  • reviewing the denial of a motion for a mistrial for an abuse of discretion
  • precluding appellate review of unrequested jury instructions unless instruction's absence is patently prejudicial
  • \[A] defendant's character and record are relevant to the jury's determination of the appropriate sentence for a capital crime.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.