S.D. New York· 3/31/2005
Carruthers v. Flaum
Citations
- 365 F. Supp. 2d 448
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5398
- 2005 WL 767875
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that because the Unkechaug are not federally recognized, IGRA provides no exception to New York’s general prohibition on gambling
- explaining that “it is well settled that on a motion to dismiss, where the validity of contracts is challenged, the court may review and properly consider the terms of the contracts that were referenced in the pleadings”
- “No legal damages flow from the inability to engage in an unlawful activity.”
- “[W]here the main objective of an agreement is illegal—here, providing a loan at an unlawful interest rate— courts will not sever and enforce incidental legal clauses.”
- “It is well settled that on a motion to dismiss, where the validity of contracts is challenged, the court may review and consider the terms of the contracts that were referenced in the pleadings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMAHON
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2006-05-26· cited 48×
- Carruthers v. FlaumS.D. New York· 2005-09-21· cited 19×
- Carruthers v. FlaumS.D. New York· 2006-09-06· cited 17×
- New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationE.D. New York· 2007-10-30· cited 15×
- Lanza v. CarboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-07-08· cited 11×
- Franks Landing Indian Cmty. v. National Indian Gaming Comm'r.Ninth Circuit· 2019-03-12· cited 8×
- Starkey v. Capstone Enterprises of Portchester, Inc.S.D. New York· 2006-06-09· cited 1×
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Law Office of Robert Jay Gumenick, P.C.S.D. New York· 2010-05-27
- Samson Lending LLC v. Greenfield Mgt. LLCNew York Supreme Court· 2023-09-05
Cites
70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals· 1993-10-19· cited 862×
- Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals· 1976-06-15· cited 800×
- Goldman v. BeldenSecond Circuit· 1985-02-12· cited 788×
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court· 1987-02-25· cited 645×
- Harsco Corp. v. SeguiSecond Circuit· 1996-08-01· cited 509×
- Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Second Circuit· 1995-10-05· cited 492×
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1980-05-01· cited 445×
- Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town of DarienSecond Circuit· 1995-05-17· cited 327×
- Eugene T. King, Jr. v. John R. Simpson, Eastern Regional Commissioner, United States Parole CommissionSecond Circuit· 1999-08-20· cited 311×
- Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1956-04-19· cited 281×
- Susan A. Desiderio v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.Second Circuit· 1999-09-22· cited 279×
- Rice v. RehnerSupreme Court· 1983-07-01· cited 224×
- Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a PartnershipEighth Circuit· 1996-06-27· cited 217×
- S.Q.K.F.C., Inc. v. Bell Atlantic Tricon Leasing CorporationSecond Circuit· 1996-05-28· cited 156×
- Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.Second Circuit· 1991-11-08· cited 130×
- Wiener v. Lazard Freres & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1998-04-16· cited 116×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.