Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 3/31/2005

Carruthers v. Flaum

Citations

  • 365 F. Supp. 2d 448
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5398
  • 2005 WL 767875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because the Unkechaug are not federally recognized, IGRA provides no exception to New York’s general prohibition on gambling
  • explaining that “it is well settled that on a motion to dismiss, where the validity of contracts is challenged, the court may review and properly consider the terms of the contracts that were referenced in the pleadings”
  • “No legal damages flow from the inability to engage in an unlawful activity.”
  • “[W]here the main objective of an agreement is illegal—here, providing a loan at an unlawful interest rate— courts will not sever and enforce incidental legal clauses.”
  • “It is well settled that on a motion to dismiss, where the validity of contracts is challenged, the court may review and consider the terms of the contracts that were referenced in the pleadings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMAHON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.