Carroll v. Humsi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that report provided to attorney for named defendant who had not been made “a party” to lawsuit was not served on “a party or the party’s attorney” within meaning of chapter 74
• noting that Legislature would not have imposed deadline for objections to report’s sufficiency on nonparty who “would be outside the court’s jurisdiction and have no duty to participate in the action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).