Hayes v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in holding that same report was adequate
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in holding that same report was adequate
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in holding that same report was adequate
• holding that, while it was possible that factfinder might ultimately reject expert’s causation opinion and conclude that plaintiff’s injury had already become irreversible before doctor’s alleged breach, that possibility did not render expert reports conclusory
• stating that possibility that factfinder might reject expert’s causation opinion and conclude instead that damage “became irreversible at a point prior to the involvement of one or more” of the medical providers did not render expert reports conclusory
• holding vascular surgeon and registered nurse were qualified to opine on standard of basic medical care in emergency room because their opinions were not directed at a matter that was unique to particular medical specialization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).