Skip to main content
· 2/25/2011

Stockton Ex Rel. Stockton v. Offenbach

Citations

  • 336 S.W.3d 610
  • 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 590
  • 2011 Tex. LEXIS 128
  • 2011 WL 711094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 74.351 does not contain “good faith” or “due diligence” exception to 120-day expert report deadline
  • explaining that Stockton’s expert report was due about two months before the trial court authorized service by publication and about six months before such service was completed
  • stating that an appellate court reviews questions of law de novo
  • “We presume that when enacting legislation, the Legislature intends to 10 comply with the state and federal constitutions, and we are obligated to avoid constitutional problems if possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Medina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.