Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 9/19/2007

Carraher v. Target Corp.

Citations

  • 503 F.3d 714
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22325
  • 101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1055
  • 2007 WL 2711919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case of age discrimination but holding that defendant’s decision to replace the plaintiff with someone twenty-eight years younger was insufficient to persuade jury that the plaintiff was discriminated against
  • noting that being “replaced by someone substantially younger . . . possesses insufficient probative value to persuade a reasonable jury that [plaintiff] was discriminated against”
  • noting being “replaced by someone substantially younger . . . possesses insufficient probative value to persuade a reasonable jury that [plaintiff] was discriminated against”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Beam, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.