Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of London

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “shift in approach” on appeal is not the same thing as raising “a new issue”
• explaining that on a motion for summary judgment courts “must view the evidence, and the inferences that may be reasonably drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party”
• “It would be in disharmony with one of the primary purposes of appellate review were we to refuse to consider each nuance or shift in approach urged by a party simply because it was not similarly urged below.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).