Nelson v. American Home Assurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he stipulated $900,000 judgment amount would be recoverable as long as it fell without a reasonable range of potential recoveries.”
• \[T]he Eighth Circuit and Minnesota courts have consistently held that estoppel cannot be used to expand or create insurance coverage where it otherwise would not exist.\
• “[T]he Eighth Circuit and Minnesota courts have consistently held that estoppel cannot be used to expand or create insurance coverage where it otherwise would not exist.”
• “[T]he duty to indemnify is determined by the factual findings of a jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).