Lewis v. St. Cloud State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “reasonable inquiries into an employee’s retirement plans do not permit an inference of [age] discrimination”
• stating “an interval as brief as two months did not show causation”
• “the important datum here is the age of the person whom the [employer] chose as [the employee’s] permanent replacement”
• “the important datum here is the age of the person whom the [employer] chose as [the employee’s] permanent replacement”
• “We think that the important datum here is the age of the person whom the University chose as Mr. Lewis’s permanent replacement.”
• “reasonable inquiries into an employee’s retirement plans do not permit an inference of age discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).