Skip to main content

Carr v. State

Citations

  • 728 N.E.2d 125
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 293
  • 2000 WL 387071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that counsel was not ineffective for not presenting evidence regarding the defendant’s mental ability to plan and carry out the crime when counsel introduced evidence of the defendant’s mental illnesses at trial
  • finding that counsel was not ineffective for not presenting evidence regarding the defendant's mental ability to plan and carry out the crime when counsel introduced evidence of the defendant's mental illnesses at trial
  • stating that the law should not “create an incentive to refuse to comply with (…continued) collection”
  • holding no jury misconduct where, during the defendant’s trial, a juror accumulated newspapers but refrained from reading them until the trial had ended at which time the juror compared the news stories with her own trial notes.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.