James Wright v. Lanson Newsome, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inmate plaintiff stated a claim for retaliation “by alleging that the actions were taken in retaliation for filing lawsuits and administrative grievances”
• holding that action taken in retaliation for inmate’s filing of administrative grievance violates inmate’s First Amendment rights
• holding that action taken in retaliation for inmate’s filing of administrative grievance violates inmate’s First Amendment rights
• recognizing that retaliation for filing lawsuits and administrative grievances violates “the inmate’s First Amendment rights”
• recognizing that retaliation for filing lawsuits and administrative grievances violates “the inmate’s First Amendment rights”
• recognizing that retaliation for filing lawsuits and administrative grievances violates “the inmate’s First Amendment rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).