Oxendine v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s delayed decision was reasonable because the Social Security Administration’s volume of applications increased, and the agency had finite resources to address the increased volume
• reversing order to phase in time limits for review of disputed old-age and survivors' benefits claims, finding delays not so unreasonable as to justify court's exercise of equitable power
• though facts and issues were similar to those in White v. Mathews, supra, no due process violation found
• delay a consideration in deciding whether due process has been accorded, but on facts no violation of due process
• delay a consideration in deciding whether due process has been accorded, but on facts no violation of due process
• “An expectation of public benefits does not confer a contractual right to receive the hoped for benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).