Abrons v. Maree

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “insignificant details” are not material and admonishing that “Delaware courts must ‘guard against the fallacy that increasingly detailed disclosure is always material and beneficial disclosure’”
• stating that this Court must “guard against” such a fallacy
• “Consistent and redundant facts do not alter the total mix of information . . . .”
• “Delaware courts must ‘guard against the fallacy that increasingly detailed disclosure is always material and beneficial disclosure.’” (quoting Zirn v. VLI Corp., 1995 WL 362616, at (Del. Ch. June 12, 1995
• “Delaware courts must ‘guard against the fallacy that increasingly detailed disclosure is always material and beneficial disclosure.’” (quoting Zirn v. VLI Corp., 1995 WL 362616, at (Del. Ch. June 12, 1995), aff’d, 681 A.2d 1050 (Del. 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).