Skip to main content
· 10/20/1982

Bisbee v. John C. Conover Agency

Citations

  • 452 A.2d 689
  • 186 N.J. Super. 335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • looking to the Restatement (Second) of Torts for the “four areas of invasion of privacy,” including “appropriation of the other‟s name or likeness”
  • granting summary judgment on misappropriation of likeness claim on basis that publication had news and historical value
  • holding a newspaper's publishing of a photograph of the plaintiff's house \taken from the street\ that \merely represented a view which [wa]s available to any bystander\ did not constitute an intrusion that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person
  • noting in part a plaintiff has no claim for invasion of privacy \where plaintiff's activities are already public or known\
  • “This tort form of invasion of privacy is analagous [sic] to defamation, in that the statement which gives rise to the cause of action must be untrue”
  • intrusion, false light privacy, public disclosure of private facts, appropriation of name or likeness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Fritz, Joelson and Petrella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.