Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 8/12/1988

Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment Group

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 1452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming sanctions and explaining that “[i]t is … en- tirely possible that a baseless factual claim will survive a mo- tion for summary judgment, particularly where an attorney prepares an affidavit for a client s[t]ating a material fact for which there is no basis”
  • affirming sanctions and explaining that “[i]t is … en- tirely possible that a baseless factual claim will survive a mo- tion for summary judgment, particularly where an attorney prepares an affidavit for a client s[t]ating a material fact for which there is no basis”
  • plaintiff should not share counsel’s liability for Rule 11 sanctions unless plaintiff had actual knowledge of wrongful conduct by counsel
  • “attorneys are expected to measure up to minimal standards of professional competence under the Rule and thus may not excuse their conduct on the ground that they were acting in good faith”
  • one hundred thousand dollars in sanctions found appropriate; district judge considered “the gravity of the rule 11 violation, the circumstances of the violation within the context of the case, and the financial resources of the respective parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Newman, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

86 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment Group

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.