Skip to main content
· 4/23/1991

Media Duplication Services, Ltd. v. Hdg Software, Inc., Joseph Wine

Citations

  • 928 F.2d 1228
  • 1991 WL 40570

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “what process is due is, in part, a function of the type and severity of the sanction”
  • approving use of monetary sanctions under Rule 16(f) as a means of deterring an attorney’s neglect of scheduled proceedings
  • approving use ___ of monetary sanctions under Rule 16(f) as a means of deterring an attorney's neglect of scheduled proceedings
  • approving use of monetary sanctions under Rule 16(f) as a means of deterring an attorney's neglect of scheduled proceedings
  • “We have no hesitation in endorsing the use of punitive monetary sanctions as a means of deterring neglect of [a Rule 16] obligation.”
  • “In general, a higher standard of due process protection is required where ... the sanction is a fine designed to go beyond' compensation and punish an attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Torruella, Woodlock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.