Skip to main content
· 3/2/1999

Cacique, Inc. v. Robert Reiser & Co.

Citations

  • 169 F.3d 619
  • 1999 WL 101400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prejudice is irrelevant when an insured enters into a settlement agreement without the insurer’s consent in violation of a voluntary payments provision
  • “[I]t is apparent that where an insured enters into a settlement agreement without the insurer’s consent in violation of a voluntary payment provision, that obligation cannot be recovered from the insurer, and prejudice is irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Lay, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.