Vermont Microsystems, Inc. v. Autodesk, Inc., Cross-Appellee, Otto G. Berkes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering that post-judgment interest and costs would run on the affirmed portion of the judgment from the date of the judgment’s entry.
• affirming trial court’s application of reasonable royalty doctrine because evidence of infringer’s profits was too imprecise
• ‘‘[a]lthough [the] calculation of the amount of damages is a factual determination, the formula used in making that calcula- tion is a question of law’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).