Taylor Marshall v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]n offender’s constitutional rights during community placement are subject to SRA-authorized infringements, including crime-related prohibitions.”
• “[A]n offender’s constitutional rights during community 22 No. 38697-0-III In re Pers. Restraint of Huezo placement are subject to SRA-authorized infringements, including crime-related prohibitions.”
• exceptional concurrent sentencing found unjustified by the facts, but court did not question the multiple offense policy as a basis in a proper case
• evidence was sufficient to supportfirearm enhancement given victim's description of the weight and feel of the gun, the way in which defendantwielded it, and evidence that defendant had a real gun and had access to other guns
• evidence was sufficient to support firearm enhancement given victim's description of the weight and feel of the gun, the way in which defendant wielded it, and evidence that defendant had a real gun and access to other guns
• spousal communications privilege is inapplicable when communications are not confidential

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).