Skip to main content

Butler v. State

Citations

  • 946 So. 2d 30
  • 2006 WL 3929525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an allegation of recantation does not require that the movant attach supporting affidavits
  • reversing denial of motion where allegations were based in part on hearsay and noting that rule 3.850 only requires a brief statement of facts in support of the motion and does not require supporting affidavits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.